Agenda and draft minutes

Agenda and draft minutes

To improve accessibility individual documents published after 1 May 2020 are available as HTML pages where their original format supports this

Speaking at a Council or Committee meeting

Venue: St Aldate's Room, Town Hall

Contact: Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer 

Items
No. Item

21.

Apologies for Absence and Substitutions

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Mohammed Niaz Abbasi, Anne-Marie Canning (Councillor Gill Sanders attended as a substitute) and James Fry (Councillor Beverley Clack attended as a substitute.

22.

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest made.

23.

Call-in - Parking in parking areas adjacent to parks - Monitoring pdf icon PDF 85 KB

Contact Officer: Mathew Metcalfe

Tel: 01865 252214, email: mmetcalfe@oxford.gov.uk

 

Background Information

The City Executive Board at its meeting on 12th September 2012 received a report which presented a review of charging for parking in car parking areas adjacent to Parks which came into operation in September 2011.  The report recommended that the charges should continue in each of the car parking areas to which they applied.

 

Attached to this agenda for information are:

 

(1)       A copy of the original report submitted to the City Executive Board;

 

(2)       An extract from the minutes from the City Executive Board meeting;

 

(3)       Further information detailing income from charges and penalties between September 2011 and 31st August 2012.

 

Why is it on the agenda?

This item has been called-in to the Value and Performance Scrutiny Committee by the Chair (Councillor Mark Mills).  The stated reasons for the call-in are to consider:

 

(1)       The impact on neighbouring areas.

 

(2)       The balance between revenue from charges and penalties (details attached).

 

(3)       Whether there are other factors in play which might be distorting the comparison of user numbers.

 

Who has been invited to comment?

The Board Member, City Development, Councillor Colin Cook.

 

What will happen after the meeting?

The Committee can either:

 

(1)       Disagree with the call-in which will mean the original City Executive Board decision is made at this point;

 

(2)       Agree wholly or partly with the call-in and report to the next City Executive Board on 5th December 2012.

 

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Head of Law and Governance submitted a report (previously circulated, now appended) following a call-in by the Chair of the Value and Performance Scrutiny Committee of the decision by the City Executive Board held on 12th September 2012 concerning Parking in Parks Review.  An extract from the minutes of this meeting plus additional information concerning income and penalties was also submitted.

 

The Chair welcomed all to the meeting and outlined the reasons for the call-in that should have been taken into consideration when the original decision was taken:

 

(i)         The impact on neighbouring areas;

(ii)        The balance between revenue from charges and penalties;

(iii)       Whether there are other factors in play which might be distorting the comparison of user numbers.

 

The Committee had invited local residents to attend the meeting to give information on the affect of the charges in their neighbourhoods.  A number of residents had chose to submit details in writing (appended to these minutes) while others who had also submitted responses in advance (details appended to these minutes) chose to come to the meeting and address the Committee.

 

Suzanne McIvor, from the Harbord Road Area Residents’ Association spoke and highlighted the following:

 

(i)         Main cause of the problems in Harbord Road was the charging for parking in Cutteslowe Park;

(ii)        Parked cars blocking resident’s driveways;

(iii)       Informed that a review was to be funded by the Council and did not understand why this had not taken place;

(iv)       Complaints made to both City and County Councillors;

(v)        No thought had been given to the wider issues before the charging had been introduced.

 

Barbara Hossier a local resident spoke and highlighted the following:

 

(i)         Cars were parking on both sides of the road turning the road into a single track;

(ii)        Residents were unable to reverse out of their driveways because of the parking;

(iii)       The issue was made worse during the weekends, school holidays and days when events took place in the park;

(iv)       A white line in front of resident’s driveways along with a single yellow line on the road would help the situation;

(v)        Large vehicles including many Council vehicles used the road to access the park.

 

Following the presentations by the local residents, the Committee debated the call-in reasons and the issues raised by the residents.  Comments raised included:

 

·                    Parking got worse since the introduction of the charges;

·                    County had proposed a scheme which was to restrictive to residents and so a new proposal was being worked on;

·                    The Park was not used by commuters;

·                    Nearly £10k had been raised from penalties, but only £2k from charges;

·                    An hour free parking would help the situation;

·                    Council had to introduce charges due to the cut in grant funding from Central Government;

·                    County Councillors could use the Area Stewardship/Locality Funding to help the situation;

·                    There is a displacement problem and it was clear this had been taken into consideration by the City Executive Board;

·                    Cutteslowe seems  ...  view the full minutes text for item 23.