Agenda and minutes

Agenda and minutes

To improve accessibility individual documents published after 1 May 2020 are available as HTML pages where their original format supports this

Speaking at a Council or Committee meeting

Venue: St Aldate's Room - Oxford Town Hall. View directions

Contact: Lois Stock 

Items
No. Item

42.

Apologies for absence

The Quorum for this Committee is four Members and substitutes are allowed.

Minutes:

There were no apologies for absence.

43.

Declarations of interest

Members are asked to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests they may have in any of the following agenda items. Guidance on this is set out at the end of these agenda pages.

Minutes:

No declarations were made.

44.

Work programme and forward plan pdf icon PDF 70 KB

Contact Officer: Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, Tel: 01865 252191

Email: phjones@oxford.gov.uk

 

 

Background Information

 

The Scrutiny Committee operates within a work programme which has been set for the year 2013-2014.

 

The programme will be reviewed at every meeting so that it can be adjusted to reflect the wishes of the Committee.

 

Why is it on the agenda?

 

This report allows Committee to:

 

·         Hear updates from Lead Members.

·         Consider forward agendas and issues.

·         Review the Forward Plan

 

In particular the Committee is asked to:

 

·         Note the information from Councillor Kennedy regarding the NAGs (requested at last meeting) – note attached;

 

·         Note the next steps of the Covered Market Review from Councillor Campbell;

 

·         Agree any recommendations from the Recycling Panel on their pre-scrutiny of the Waste and Recycling Strategy.

 

Who has been invited to comment?

 

Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, will present the work programme, answer questions and support the Committee in its decision making.

 

What will happen after the meeting?

 

The work programme will be updated and republished.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, introduced the current work programme and Forward Plan to the Committee, and provided some background and context.

 

Cllr Campbell updated the Committee on the timeline for the completion of the Covered Market Panel.

·         The Retail Group’s report is out for consultation and there is an opportunity for the public to comment on the strategy on the council website. He asked that ward Councillors circulate the line to any constituents so that as many people could comment on the strategy as possible.

·         The draft Covered Market Strategy and results of the consultation will likely go to CEB in January 2014. The Panel’s final report will be presented to the Scrutiny Committee on 14 January and (if members are willing) will be presented to CEB at its January meeting.

·         The Panel will also pre-scrutinise the consultation process in a separate report to be presented in January.

 

The Committee reviewed the Forward Plan but had no new items they wished to pre-scrutinise.

45.

Report back on recommendations pdf icon PDF 42 KB

Contact Officer: Pat Jones (Principal Scrutiny Officer), Tel 01865 252191, phjones@oxford.gov.uk

 

 

Background Information

 

The Committee makes a number of recommendations to Officers and decision makers.  This item allows Committee to see the result of recommendations since the last meeting and the cumulative results of all its recommendations.

  

Why is it on the agenda?

 

The results of recommendations on:

 

·         City deal Bid;

·         Grants Commissioning Review;

·         Performance Indicator LP106;

·         NAGs (see above)

 

are the latest items on the list.

 

Who has been invited to comment?

 

Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer will present the report back.

 

What will happen after the meeting?

 

Any comments or follow up from the Committee will be included in the work programme. 

 

 

 

Minutes:

Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer introduced the report back on recommendations from the Scrutiny Committee to CEB. The performance indicator LP106 on participation in leisure amongst target groups was the only scrutiny recommendation that was refused by CEB. Scrutiny queried why the Council was maintaining a target that was constantly met, however the Board Member sighted that until more analysis on the overall trend of participation levels could be determined it would be unhelpful to change the target.

 

The Committee resolved to note the recommendations and their outcome as shown in the report.

46.

Councillor Calls for Action operating protocol pdf icon PDF 111 KB

Contact Officer: Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, Tel 01865 252191, phjones@oxford.gov.uk

 

 

Background Information

 

The Council meeting on the 30th. September 2013 agreed a protocol for “Councillor Calls for Action” (CCfA) - this is attached at Appendix 1 of the report.

 

The agreement was subject to any changes the Scrutiny Committee wished to make.  The Chair and Vice-Chair of the Scrutiny Committee have considered how the process might operate effectively within the scrutiny function. 

 

This report to scrutiny processes a number of changes and additions.

 

Why is it on the agenda?

 

This item is presented to the Committee so that it can agree the process within which “councillor calls for action” will be handled by the Scrutiny Committee.                                                                                      

The changes and additions suggested in the report are divided between 3 steps.  These are:

 

         Raising an issue – the information a councillor should provide at the first point of contact;

 

         Taking the issue forward – who decides a request is valid and how that decision is made;

 

         Guarantees for councillors – reasonable timescales and onward referral.

 

Who has been invited to comment?

 

The Principal Scrutiny Officer will present the report to the Committee

 

What will happen after the meeting?

 

Subject to the agreement of the Committee, the process for Councillor Calls for Action will be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes:

Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, introduced the report on Councillors Call to Action operating protocol.

 

The Committee resolved

 

1.    To amend the referral form to direct councillors to provide more specific information and officers to clarify any current debates, reviews or projects related to the issue.

 

2.    To leave the factual judgement around a CCfA falling within an excluded category with the Monitoring Officer but to place any further validation with the Chair and Vice Chair of the Scrutiny Committee.

 

3.    To require the instigating councillor to attend the scrutiny meeting that discusses the CCfA.

 

4.    To add to the list of considerations for the scrutiny committee when considering a valid CCfA:

 

  • What priority the CCfA investigation should have within the current agreed work programme.

 

To make it clear that this list is not exhaustive.

 

5.    To require the Chair and Vice Chair to take advice from officers when CCfA raise issues outside of the direct control of this Council.

 

6.    To include the guarantees included in the report in the protocol.

47.

Performance monitoring - Quarter 2 pdf icon PDF 171 KB

Contact Officer: Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, Tel 01865 252191, phjones@oxford.gov.uk

 

 

Background Information

 

The Scrutiny Committee set a small Panel of members to consider the available performance measures and select two sets, linked to the scrutiny programme, for monitoring on a quarterly basis. 

 

The sets were to be considered by the Housing Panel and the Scrutiny Committee. The attached table includes the selection for the Scrutiny Committee.

 

Why is it on the agenda?

 

These tables represent performance at the end of Quarter 2.  The Panel was able to find and select measures that related to the following priorities of the Committee:

 

  • Youth Ambition.
  • Reducing Emissions.
  • Participation in Healthy Activities.
  • Improved Recycling.
  • Great Customer Contact
  • Empowerment.
  • Corporate Health.

 

 

Who has been invited to comment?

 

Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, will present the report.  Any detailed information required by the Scrutiny Committee will be requested and service measures will attend the next available meeting.

 

What will happen after the meeting?

 

Any recommendations will be made to the Board Member or the next available City Executive Board.

 

If the Committee wishes to question Service Officers on performance these will be invited to a future meeting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes:

Pat Jones, Principal Scrutiny Officer, introduced the report on Performance Monitoring- Quarter 2 to the Committee, and provided some background and context.

 

The Committee resolved to note the report and requested more information of the following indicators:

 

·         CH001- sickness: would like a commentary on performance

·         BV017a: percentage of black and ethnic minority employees: further commentary on progress

·         LP106: increase participation in leisure centres by target groups:  further commentary on progress

·         B10002a: training places created through Council’s investment projects: further commentary on progress

48.

Recycling - Panel Report pdf icon PDF 94 KB

Contact Officers: Sarah Claridge, Democratic and Electoral Services Officer, 01865 252402, email: sclaridge@oxford.gov.uk and Mathew Metcalfe, Democratic and Electoral Services Officer, 1865 252214, email mmetcalfe@oxford.gov.uk

 

 

Background Information

 

The Committee set a Panel consisting of Councillors Fry (Lead Member), Jones and Simmons to consider if the Council’s recycling target was sufficiently ambitious.  An interim report was presented to the Scrutiny Committee at which time the Panel was asked to focus their inquiries on incentives to recycle and their effectiveness both those used by the Council and other authorities. 

 

Why is it on the agenda?

 

The Panel will outline its findings.

 

Who has been invited to comment?

 

Councillor Fry the Lead Member will lead this item.

 

What will happen after the meeting?

 

Agreed recommendations will be presented to the City Executive Board.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes:

Councillors Fry, Jones and Simmons introduced the pre-scrutiny report on the draft Waste and Recycling Strategy and went through the Panel’s recommendations.

 

Treating Waste as a Commodity

Councillor Jones explained the importance of treating waste as a commodity and the desire of the panel to pre-sort the waste before it goes to landfill. Any materials that are diverted from the waste stream, saves the County Council money in landfill tax, and reduces the City’s total waste amount which increases the overall recycling rate. The Cleaner GreenerServices Manager would like to see a waste transfer station to pre-sort waste within the city.

 

Collecting Food Waste from Flats

The Council does not currently own enough vehicles which can collect the larger communal food waste bins to allow for a full roll out of the food waste collection to all flats across the city. Purchasing two specially equipped vehicles and the staffing costs of 6 people (3 per vehicle) would cost over £900,000 over 3 years.

 

Collecting Garden Waste

The Cleaner Greener Services Manager explained that the city was currently at a tipping point for collecting garden waste. The City has nearly 14,000 garden waste customers and the city needs another vehicle to expand the service.

 

Food Waste Bid

The Cleaner Greener Services Manager has made a funding bid to roll out food waste collection across the city. The bid is to fund the purchase of 2 new ‘fit for purpose’ vehicles and staffing costs. The Council will know in December whether it’s been considered as part of the budget setting process. The Committee would like to see the Food Waste bid as soon as it’s made public.

 

Commercial Waste collection

The Council does not have any corporate targets for commercial waste and is consequently missing out on opportunities to expand its commercial waste collection in the city.

 

Penalty Notices

The Panel felt that the Council needed to be more forceful in pursuing people who don’t recycle. However there were concerns raised that strict enforcement policies can lead to more people dumbing rubbish in other people’s bins which can lead to higher contamination rates. The Council should therefore focus on positive programmes to encourage recycling rather than negative enforcement campaigns.

 

The Cleaner Greener Services Manager outlined that Council can only penalise householders for failing to put their waste out for collection not for failing to recycle.

 

Reducing Packaging

The Cleaner Greener Services Manager expressed concern about the Panel’s packaging recommendation and suggested that the Oxfordshire Joint Waste Partnership was the more appropriate body to recommend this to as they have more scope in there remit to work with businesses to reduce packaging. The Committee agreed.

 

The Committee resolved:

 

1.    To see the Food Waste bid as soon as it’s been made public,

 

2.    That the Finance Panel sees the long list of officer bids for capital and revenue projects proposed for the budget 2014/15, as soon as they are available.

 

Recommendations to CEB on 13 November

 

The Committee resolved to make the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 48.

49.

Riverside Land - pre scrutiny pdf icon PDF 114 KB

Contact Officer: John Copley, Head of Environmental Development, 01865 252386, email: jcopley@oxford.gov.uk, and Fiona Piercy, Partnerships and Regeneration Manager, 01865 252185, email fpiercy@oxford.gov.uk

 

 

Background Information

 

The attached report concerning the acquisition of riverside land will be presented to CEB on 13th November, at which time CEB will be asked to approve the acquisition by adverse possession of the strip of riverside land adjacent to Abbey Road. The aim is to allow the Council to regularize mooring on this land

 

Why is it on the agenda?

 

The Scrutiny Committee has asked to include this item on the agenda for pre decision scrutiny

 

Who has been invited to comment?

 

Councillor Cook, Board Member for City Development and John Copley, Head of Environmental Development, will attend the meeting in order to answer the Committees questions. 

 

What will happen after the meeting?

 

Any recommendations from the Scrutiny Committee will be presented at CEB in November.

 

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

John Copley, Head of Environmental Services introduced the report on Riverside Land to the Committee. The report will be decided by CEB in November and was called in to the Scrutiny Committee by Cllr Simmons.

 

The Head of Environmental Services outlined that the acquisition of the land would allow Council to control the mooring of boats along the strip. Unauthorised moorings have damaged the bank and some boat owners have engaged in antisocial behaviour which has impacted on the residents of Abbey Road. However if Council acquires the land, up to 6 short term/ visitor moorings (not residential mooring which is contrary to Council Policy) would be created.

 

There is also concern about the weakening of the bank as people mooring, have driven pegs into the ground. However if the Council owned the land, a maintenance programme will be established and rings will be inserted for boaters to use. 

 

Cllr Simmons was concerned about the future on-going management of the strip of land. The Environment Agency is currently piloting a new way of managing mooring which treats moorings similar to car parking with fines for overstaying. This pilot has been very successful and it had been agreed in principle, that if the pilot is made permanent that the scheme will extend to this strip of land   (if the title is granted to the Council).

 

The proposed acquisition and management of the land has local resident support. Julian Levay spoke on behalf of Abbey Road residents and indicated that residents were prepared to assist with routine maintenance, enforcement and even financial support.

 

Recommendations to CEB on 13 November

 

The Committee resolved to make the following recommendation:

 

To support the proposals in the report and ask the City Executive Board to note the offer of residents.

50.

Oxpens Masterplan Consultation Outcome - pre-scrutiny pdf icon PDF 133 KB

Contact Officer: Fiona Piercy, Partnerships and Regeneration Manager, Tel 01865 252185, email fpiercy@oxford.gov.uk

 

 

Background Information

 

Following approval from CEB in June 2013 to formally consult on the Oxpens Masterplan Supplementary Planning Document, (SPD), City Executive Board will be asked to consider proposed changes to the document arising from public consultation, and then to agree to its adoption.

 

The draft Oxpens Masterplan SPD will supplement existing plans by explaining how the policies can be interpreted. It will add a further degree of detail and set out the Council’s aspirations for the area but will not introduce any new policies.

 

Why is it on the agenda?

 

Members of the Committee selected this topic for pre-scrutiny. Its presentation here will allow the Scrutiny Committee to make any comments and recommendations on the report to CEB to help shape its final form before approval is given

 

 

Who has been invited to comment?

 

Fiona Piercy, Partnerships and Regeneration Manager, has been invited to the meeting.

 

What will happen after the meeting?

 

Any recommendations will be passed to the relevant Board Member and City Executive Board

 

 

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee commented on the merits of the proposed Oxpens masterplan going to CEB in November. The plan is a guideline for development and each part will require planning permission before development can begin.

 

The following comments were made:

·         The plan should include more housing and less retail. This site is an opportunity to create 600 homes rather than the proposed 300

·         Not convinced about the need for a hotel

·         Chance to create a new community, reduce traffic and congestion

·         300 homes and 1000 new jobs is great for the city.

 

The Board Member for City Development responded that the site is more suitable for student accommodation rather than family homes because of its proximity to the railway lines. By building more purpose built student accommodation it frees up housing elsewhere in the city for families.

 

There was a concern that the masterplan identified issues such as transport links, flooding, energy use but did not include a framework to deal with these issues. 

 

The Board Member stated that the council will have an opportunity to see more detail of the development when it determines the planning applications for this scheme.

 

Recommendations to CEB on 13 November

 

The Committee resolved to make the following recommendation:

 

To support the Oxpens Site Master Plan noting the concerns made by some committee members.

51.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 62 KB

Minutes of the meeting held on 1st October 2013

Minutes:

The Committee resolved to confirm as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 1 October 2013.

52.

Dates of future meetings

The following dates have been agreed:-

 

3rd December 2013

14th January 2014

4th February 2014

4th March 2014

1st April 2014

 

Minutes:

The Committee noted the next meeting was scheduled for 3 December 2013.