Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Election of Chair for 2011/12 Council Year
The constitution states that the Chair must be
from an opposition political party.
Minutes:
Councillor Brown was elected as Chair for the
2011/12 Council year.
|
2. |
Election of Vice-Chair for 2011/12 Council Year
Minutes:
Councillor Seamons was elected as Vice-Chair
for the 2011/12 Council year.
|
3. |
Apologies for Absence and Substitutions
Minutes:
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Humberstone and Malik.
Councillors Sanders and Sinclair attended as
substitutes.
|
4. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
There were no declarations of interest
made.
|
5. |
Standing Item: Report back on the Committee's recommendations to the City Executive Board and on matters of interest to the Committee PDF 30 KB
Contact Officer: Alec Dubberley, Democratic
Services Officer
Tel: (01865) 252402, email: adubberley@oxford.gov.uk
|
Background
information
|
|
This Committee has made a
number of recommendations to City Executive Board and officers.
This item reports on the outcomes from these.
|
|
Why is the item on
the agenda?
|
|
To report back on reports submitted to the
Board on Quarter 3 Performance, Quarter 3 Finance and the Corporate
Plan.
|
|
Who has been invited
to comment?
|
|
The Democratic Services Officer
will go through the outcomes and answer questions.
|
|
What will happen
after the meeting?
|
|
Any further follow up will be
pursued within the work programme.
|
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee noted the recommendations made
to the Executive Board and the response received.
|
6. |
Destination Management Organisation - Business Case PDF 152 KB
Michael Crofton-Briggs, Head of City
Development email: mcrofton-briggs@oxford.gov.uk
Tel: 01865 252360
|
Background
information
|
|
At its meeting on 22 February
the Committee received a report giving details of the establishment
of a Destination Management Organisation for the delivery of
Tourism Services in Oxfordshire. The Committee requested that the
full business plan for the venture should be submitted to a future
meeting.
|
|
Why is the item on
the agenda?
|
|
The business case is
attached.
The Committee was particularly
interested in considering information on the operation which is
hosted by the City Council. In particular to look at
the:
• Membership
base
• The development of the
service offer
• Contractual
arrangements
• Governance
|
|
Who has been invited
to comment?
|
|
Michael Crofton-Briggs (Head of
Service) and Councillor Cook (Lead Board Member) have been invited
to attend.
|
|
What will happen
after the meeting
|
|
Any requests will be made to officers for
further action. Recommendations to City
Executive Board will be considered by the Board or the Board Member
at a future meeting.
|
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Head of City Development submitted a
report (previously circulated, now appended) presenting the
business case for the Destination Management Organisation set up to
manage the tourism offer in Oxfordshire.
Michael Crofton-Briggs introduced the report
reminding the Committee that the City Council had seconded its
Tourist Information Centre staff to the new venture for a period of
two years. The following points were rasied in discussion:-
- It was noted that core funding from
the City Council would reduce by 10% over the next four years and
that the company would not be forecasting to make a profit due to
its status as a not for profit company.
- The figures quoted in the business
plan are best assumptions as there was no baseline data to enable
an accurate forecast.
- The County Council and other
Oxfordshire districts were also providing core funding although the
exact amounts were still the subject of negotiations. There was no
financial commitment from the City Council beyond the
4th year of the venture.
- The risk to the City Council, beyond
the initial grant investment, was small with no further liability
placed on the City Council. Seconded staff would return to being
employed by the City Council should the venture fail.
- Buy in from the Oxfordshire tourism
trade was progressing well although as the venture becomes more
established, with a demonstrable track record, buy in should
naturally increase.
Resolved to:-
1)
Note the content of the business plan and financial information
2)
Request that a progress report on the venture is brought before the
Committee in one year.
|
7. |
Performance Reporting PDF 85 KB
Contact Officer: Jane Lubbock, Head of
Business Improvement email: jlubbock@oxford.gov.uk Tel:
01865 252218. (Quarter 4 performance)
Simon Howick, Head of People and Equalities
email showick@oxford.gov.uk
Tel: 01865 252547 (Attendance Management)
|
Background
information
|
|
The monitoring of corporate
performance is a significant part of the Committee’s
remit. The report represents
performance against targets for the 2010/11 year.
In the previous work programme
detailed in-year performance was considered by a Finance and
Performance Panel.
The Committee have also
instructed officers to keep them briefed on the number of staff
days lost due to absence. The report attached summarises
performance in this area over the previous 12 month
period.
|
|
Why is the item on
the agenda?
|
|
To enable the whole Committee
to see the delivery against targets for 2010/11 and consider future
performance monitoring arrangements.
|
|
Who has been invited
to comment?
|
|
Jane Lubbock and Simon Howick
(Heads of Service) and Councillors Turner and Price (Lead Board
Members) have been invited to attend.
|
|
What will happen
after the meeting
|
|
Recommendations to City Executive Board will
be considered by the Board at its meeting on 22 June.
|
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Head of Business Improvement submitted a
report (previously circulated, now appended) which contained
non-financial performance monitoring information for Quarter 4 of
the last financial year as well as the full year results.
Also submitted was a report from the Head of
People and Equalities giving information on staff days lost to
sickness during the some period.
Councillor Price presented the report
highlighting the following information:-
- 82% of targets were met or exceeded
most notably the number of days lost to sickness and reduced
household waste sent to landfill.
- Targets that were not achieved
included the percentage of household waste that was recycled and
number of affordable homes provided. It
was recognised that the affordable homes target would be very
difficult to achieve and the authority deliberately set an
ambitious target. A flats recycling officer had been employed in
the hope of increasing the recycling rate right across the
City.
The Committee was disappointed that target
CP16.10, customers getting through first time on the telephone, was
not achieved despite the allocation of extra resources. The Head of
Customer Services explained that demand for the call centre had
consistently increased over the past year with an extra twenty
thousand calls relating to the new recycling scheme being taken as
well as spikes in demand during the cold winter weather. Measures
to improve the performance had been taken including staff training
and alterations to shift patterns, improved call handling
technology. Further improvements were expected following the
merging of two call centres into one. Another way to improve
performance was to make more services available online which would
be happening soon.
Resolved to note the
report in particular the overall pleasing performance levels across
the Council.
|
8. |
Provisional Outturn Report 2010/11 PDF 262 KB
Contact Officer: Nigel Kennedy, Head of
Finance email: nkennedy@oxford.gov.uk Tel:
01865 252708
|
Background
information
|
|
Delivery of the budget is
key to the health of the organisation
and the Committee monitored performance throughout
2010/11.
In the previous work programme
detailed in-year financial monitoring was considered by a Finance
and Performance Panel.
|
|
Why is the item on
the agenda?
|
|
To enable the whole Committee
to see the budget position for 2010/11 and consider future
financial monitoring arrangements.
|
|
Who has been invited
to comment?
|
|
Nigel Kennedy (Head of Service)
and Councillor Turner (Lead Board Member) have been invited to
attend.
|
|
What will happen
after the meeting?
|
|
Recommendations to City Executive Board will
be considered at the meeting on 22 June 2011.
|
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Head of Finance submitted a report
(previously circulated, now appended) setting out the forecast
outturn position for the Council’s Capital and Revenue
budgets for the year ended 31st March 2011 compared to the approved
budget. In addition it provided explanations for variances from the
outturn reported as at 28 February 2011.
The Head of Finance introduced the report
highlighting that the general fund had a more favourable than
expected surplus resulting in an additional transfer to the
severance and HR reserve. He added that a one off income of
recovered VAT of approximately £800,000 was paid during the
year. Other reasons for pressure on the budget included slippage as
a result of the appointed contractor for the Old Fire Station
project going into administration.
Members thanked the Head of Finance for
presenting the information in an easy to understand format. The
Committee expressed some concern in the following areas:-
- A high level of unachieved savings
seemed to account for a large amount of the overspend in some
areas
- There was a particularly high level
of underspend in Housing and
Communities which would not be repeated in future years once staff
posts were filled.
- There was an apparent underspend on the staff training budget.
Resolved to note the report and pass the above
comment to the meeting of the City Executive Board on 22 June.
|
9. |
Progress on Leisure Management Contract 2010/11 PDF 248 KB
Contact Officer: Ian Brooke, Head of City
Leisure and Parks, email: ibrooke@oxford.gov.uk Tel: 01865
252707
|
Background
information
|
|
At the November 2010 meeting
the Committee considered performance within the Fusion Leisure
Contract against agreed targets. Members asked to consider the end
of year position requesting data to be supported by performance
detailed for each leisure centre.
|
|
Why is the item on
the agenda?
|
|
The Committee agreed to monitor
the following in relation to leisure contract:
• Value for
Money
• Increased
participation
• Improvements to the
quality of service
• Out reach
work
• Carbon
management
|
|
Who has been invited
to comment?
|
|
Ian Brooke (Head of Service)
and Councillor Coulter (Lead Board Member) have been invited to
attend.
|
|
What will happen
after the meeting
|
|
Any requests will be made to officers for
further action. Recommendations to City
Executive Board will be considered by the Board or the Board Member
at a future meeting.
|
Minutes:
The Head of City Leisure submitted a report
(previously circulated, now appended) providing a performance
update for the leisure management contract.
Councillor Coulter, Board Member for Leisure,
picked out the following points from the report:-
- Participation at all sites had
increased, particularly at Barton where some of the most vulnerable
members of the community were getting access to leisure
provision.
- A reduced subsidy per user and an
increase in customer satisfaction had been recorded as well as an
overall reduction in Carbon emissions.
- The level of staff satisfaction at
leisure centres was of concern.
In response to this the Committee rasied the
following points:-
- For future reports, a breakdown of
subsidy per user per site would be useful to ascertain the true
cost of the services provided. This was also true for levels of
carbon emissions.
- Concern was expressed regarding the
government’s decision to withdraw free swimming for children.
Take up of the free sessions provided locally had fallen since the
national scheme was abolished.
- In response to a question about
increased fees in response to a VAT rise, it was explained that
although leisure admission charges were not subject to VAT, goods
and services paid for at leisure centres were. This resulted in
higher operating costs which unfortunately had to be passed on to
leisure users.
- The Committee asked for the graphs
to be presented in a more uniform way so that trends could be more
easily identified.
Resolved to:-
1)
Request that information on subsidy cost per user per centre as
well as carbon emission for each site for each user be provided in
future reports; and
2)
Request that graphs submitted to future meetings be presented in a
more meaningful way.
|
10. |
Work Programme
In previous years the Committee has met
informally to discuss work programme options for the forthcoming
year. One suggested date for this is 20 July.
Minutes:
The Committee agreed to schedule a further
informal meeting to agree a work programme for the forthcoming
council year.
|
11. |
Minutes PDF 28 KB
Minutes of the meeting held on 5 April
2011.
Minutes:
Resolved to approve, as a correct record, the
minutes of the meeting held on 5 April 2011.
|
12. |
Times and dates of future meetings
The Committee is reminded of the following
dates for future meetings:-
12 September 2011
21 November 2011
30 January 2012
26 March 2012
The Committee must determine at what time
future meetings take place.
Minutes:
Resolved to set the start time for future
meetings to 6 pm on the following dates:-
12 September 2011
21 November 2011
30 January 2012
26 March 2012
|