Agenda and minutes
To improve accessibility individual documents published after 1 May 2020 are available as HTML pages where their original format supports this
Speaking at a Council or Committee meeting
- Attendance details
- Agenda frontsheet PDF 135 KB View agenda as DOC
- Agenda reports pack
- Amended Foreword to Climate Change Review Group Report and Blackbird Leys Development Confidential Legal Advice PDF 175 KB
- Performance Monitoring Q3 Commentary by Councillor James Fry PDF 106 KB
- Printed minutes PDF 117 KB View minutes as DOC
Venue: St Aldate's Room - Oxford Town Hall. View directions
Contact: John Mitchell, Committee Services Officer
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of interest Minutes: Councillor Gant declared a non-pecuniary interest in relation to the draft report of the Climate Emergency Review Group (item 8 of the agenda) as a member of Oxford Co-Wheels Car Club.
|
|
Chair's Announcements Minutes: The Chair noted the need to go into confidential session if the Committee wished to discuss any of the confidential appendices in relation to items 5, 6 and 9
|
|
Recommendation: That the minutes of the meeting held on 04 February 2020be APPROVED as a true and accurate record.
Minutes: The Committee resolved to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting held on 04 Februrary 2020 as a true and accurate record subject to the addition of Councillor Altaf-Khan to the list of those present. |
|
Blackbird Leys Development Project Detailed design PDF 188 KB At its meeting on 11 March, Cabinet will consider a report on the Blackbird Leys Development Project. This item provides an opportunity for the Committee to comment on the report and make such recommendations to the Cabinet as it wishes. Councillor Linda Smith, Cabinet Member for Leisure & Housing; Tom Bridgman, Executive Director, Development; and Andrew Humpherson, Regeneration Manager have been invited to attend for this item. Appendix 4 (Legal Report) will be issued as a supplement to this agenda. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee passed a resolution in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 4(2)(b) of the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 to exclude the press and members of the public during discussion of this item on the grounds that it might involve disclosure of exempt information as described in the relevant paragraphs of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. The minute of this item is therefore restricted too. At the conclusion of this item the Committee moved back into public session.
|
|
Annual Report on Gender Pay Gap PDF 108 KB At its meeting on 11 March, Cabinet will consider the Annual Report on the Gender Pay Gap. This item provides an opportunity for the Committee to comment on the report and make such recommendations to the Cabinet as it wishes. Councillor Chapman, Cabinet Member for Safer Communities and Customer Focused Services and Helen Bishop, Head of Business Improvement have been invited to attend for this item. Additional documents:
Minutes: Councillor Nigel Chapman, Cabinet Member for Customer Focused Services introduced the report which fulfilled a statutory requirement and drew attention to a mean gender pay gap of about 10%. The previous year’s report had shown an almost negligible pay gap. The increase was accounted for by the separation of colleagues in Oxford Direct Services for the first time and who were not now included in the Council figures. In very broad terms, higher paid jobs were more likely to be held by men and women were more likely to work part time, both of which contributed to the gap. While the increase was regrettable, it compared favourably with an average pay gap elsewhere of about 18%. While some other authorities had a significantly smaller gap, this was probably attributable to the fact that they had not, like the Council, taken the step of setting up arms’ length companies.
The pay gap calculation was partly determined with reference the “Partnership Payment” scheme. Helen Bishop, Head of Business Improvement, explained that this bonus payment was, like basic pay, determined on a pro-rata basis, which further contributed to the gap because of the high proportion of female staff working part time. This scheme had however now come to an end. The current pay deal was based on a percentage increase or fixed sum increase, designed to be of greater benefit to lower paid staff.
While not directly related to the matter of the pay gap, it was agreed that there would be merit in the Council providing an environment which encouraged men to take on greater levels of parental responsibility. This was something which could be facilitated by the increasing ease with which work could be done from home and opportunities for part time work, all of which would contribute to the message that the Council was an enlightened employer.
The Committee agreed to make the following recommendation to Cabinet:
That the Council gives greater prominence to promoting male take-up of shared parental leave within its current and prospective workforce. A particular suggestion is the inclusion of articles within Council Matters by male staff who have taken shared parental leave on their experiences and the benefits they have encountered.
|
|
Performance Monitoring 2019/20 Quarter 3 PDF 82 KB The Scrutiny Committee has a role in monitoring Council performance. Quarterly reports are provided on a set of selected corporate and service performance indicators.This item provides an opportunity for the Committee to comment on the report and make such recommendations to the Cabinet as it wishes. This report will be presented by Helen Bishop, Head of Business Improvement.
Additional documents:
Minutes: Councillor James Fry had commented on the report and his comments, together with the Scrutiny Officer’s response to them had been published with the Committee’s papers. The committee accepted the recommendations given in the later paper. Helen Bishop, Head of Business Improvement, had met Councillor Fry to discuss the Committee’s role in relation to performance monitoring as a result of which there would be a review of the way in which these indicators were presented.
The Committee agreed to make the following recommendation to Cabinet:
That from the next civic year Council adopts performance measures for the following:
a) The proportion of total FTEs within the Council that are filled, and are vacant, preferably by service area b) Short and long term staff absences
|
|
The Committee is asked to approve the following reports for submission to Cabinet on 11 March.
· Report of the Climate Emergency Review Group. · Integrated Performance report for Q3 (if required this will be published as a supplement)
Additional documents: Minutes: The Chair commended the Review Group’s report to the Committee as an excellent piece of work. In his role as Chair of the Growth Board’s Scrutiny Panel he sought the Committee’s agreement to submitting the report to the Panel. The Panel would be considering the matter of a Climate Emergency in a few days’ time.
Councillor Richard Howlett, speaking as Chair of the Review Group, paid tribute to all those who had contributed to the review. It was noteworthy that the report’s 56 recommendations covered all but one of the Council’s 10 portfolio areas, illustrating the wide ranging relevance and importance of the climate change issue. The Review Group’s recent visit to an innovative building programme in Southmoor had provided a thought provoking insight into the possibilities of building homes to a Passivhaus standard at a cost comparable to traditional building methods. The work of the group had made it clear that it while it would be a challenge to meet local and national targets for the reduction in carbon emissions, the availability of local skills, technology and enthusiasm made that challenge less daunting than it would otherwise be.
The Chair noted that the views of the witness from Oxford University given in the report were not, necessarily, those of the Conference of Colleges.
The recommendation relating to reviewing the Council’s investment criteria to enable investment in energy co-operatives was welcome but it was recognised that it was too early to say how this might be achieved.
The Committee made a number of detailed suggestions and agreed to delegate responsibility for final adjustments to the report to Councillor Howlett and the Scrutiny Officer.
The Chair congratulated those involved in assembling the report and was pleased to hear that there would a press release to accompany its presentation to Cabinet in due course.
|
|
Report back on recommendations PDF 372 KB Since the last meeting Cabinet has responded to the Committee’s recommendations on: Budget Review for 2020/21; Capital Strategy; Customer Experience Strategy; Performance Monitoring Strategy,Q2; and Plans for introduction of a ZEZ. Copies of Cabinet’s responses are attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Chair reported back on the Cabinet’s response to the Committee’s most recent recommendations in relation to: Budget Review for 2020/21; Capital Strategy; Customer Experience Strategy; Performance Monitoring Strategy Q2; and Plans for the introduction of a ZEZ. It was pleasing to see that, with the exception of those in relation to the introduction of a ZEZ, most of the Committee’s recommendations had been wholly or partly accepted. |
|
Work Plan and Forward Plan PDF 119 KB The Scrutiny Committee operates within a work plan which is agreed at the start of the Council year. The Work Plan is reviewed at each meeting so that it can be adjusted to reflect the wishes of the Committee and take account of any changes to the latest Forward Plan (which outlines decisions to be taken by the Cabinet or Council). The Committee is asked to review and note its work plan for the remainder of the 2019/20 Council year. The Committee is also asked to recommend an outline programme for the beginning of the forthcoming Council year. Additional documents: Minutes: The Scrutiny Officer made recommendations to the Committee for changes to its workplan for the remainder of the Council year consequent upon changes to the Forward Plan.
Looking to the beginning of the next Council year it would be helpful to prepare a draft workplan for the new Committee. Items provisionally scheduled for the first meeting of the Committee in June included the Local Plan, Economic and City Centre Strategy, East Oxford Community Centre Improvement Scheme, and the Oxpens Redevelopment Update. There was concern that there would be insufficient time to deal satisfactorily with all of these significant matters at one meeting. The timing of Scrutiny items destined, subsequently, for Cabinet was however constrained by the timetable and process for production of those reports which meant that none of these reports, on the basis of the current Cabinet Forward Plan, could come to the Committee earlier than listed. It was noted however that Forward Plan items were frequently deferred and it was highly likely there would be no need to consider all of these items at the June meeting. |
|
Dates of future meetings
Meetings are scheduled as follows:
Scrutiny Committee
· 06 April, 02 June
Standing Panels · Housing Standing Panel: 05 March, 08 April · Companies Panel: 12 March, 22 June · Finance Panel: 30 June
All meetings start at 6.00 pm
Minutes: Meetings are scheduled as follows:
Scrutiny Committee · 06 April, 02 June
Standing Panels · Housing Panel: 05 March, 08 April · Companies Panel: 12 March; 22 June · Finance Panel: 30 June
All meetings start at 6.00pm |
|
Matters exempt from Publication If the Committee wishes to exclude the press and the public from the meeting during consideration of any of the items on the exempt from publication part of the agenda, it will be necessary for the Committee to pass a resolution in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 4(2)(b) of the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 on the grounds that their presence could involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as described in specific paragraphs of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972.
The Board may maintain the exemption if and so long as, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
|
|
Blackbird Leys Development Project Detailed Design - confidential appendices Minutes: Discussed in confidential session. |