Agenda and minutes

Agenda and minutes

To improve accessibility individual documents published after 1 May 2020 are available as HTML pages where their original format supports this

Speaking at a Council or Committee meeting

Venue: St Aldate's Room - Oxford Town Hall. View directions

Contact: John Mitchell, Committee Services Officer 

Items
No. Item

71.

Declarations of interest

Minutes:

The following declarations were noted in relation to Agenda item 8: Grant Allocations to Community and Voluntary Organisations 2018/19

·       Councillor Gant – as a trustee of the Ark T Centre

·       Councillor Cook – as a member of the Oxford International Link

·       Councillor Curran – as the Council’s representative on Pegasus Theatre Trust and as a member of Fusion Arts and the Donnington Doorstep Family Centre

·       Councillor Ladbrooke – as the Council’s representative on the Barton Community Association

72.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 120 KB

Minutes from 15 January 2018

 

Recommendation: That the minutes of the meeting held on 15 January 2018 be APPROVED as a true and accurate record.

 

Minutes:

The Committee resolved to approve the minutes of the meeting held on

15 January 2018 as a true and accurate record subject to the following minor corrections:

 

Minute 68: Air Quality Annual Status Report for 2016

6th paragraph

The particularly poor outcomes for St Clements were a matter of concern and a strategic group (with County Council representation) would meet presently soon to address those concerns. The County Council had conducted a traffic survey of the area and one possibility being explored was the re-phasing of traffic lights (to keep traffic flowing).  Interestingly two monitoring sites in the area, just 10 – 15 metres apart produced markedly different results.

10th paragraph

The Council had not benefitted from bid for funding from the recently announced government funding pot of £4.5m to be put towards electric car charging points. 

Final paragraph

The Scrutiny Officer noted the following key points has as

73.

Report back on recommendations pdf icon PDF 128 KB

 

Background Information

Scrutiny is empowered to make recommendations to the City Executive Board, which is obliged to respond in writing.

Why is it on the agenda?

For the Committee to note and comment on recent executive responses to Scrutiny recommendations.  Since the last meeting the Executive has responded to recommendations on the following items:

·         Preventing elderly isolation

·         Oxford Direct Services Limited (ODSL) and Oxford Direct Services Trading Limited (ODSTL) Business Plan

Who has been invited to comment?

·         Andrew Brown, Committee and Member Services Manager.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Scrutiny Officer presented the report on recommendations made to the City Executive Board.

 

The Scrutiny Committee had considered a report by the Head of Community Services on preventing elderly isolation at its meeting on 5 December 2017 and the recommendations had been submitted to the City Executive Board on 23 January 2018.  The City Executive Board response had now been circulated (appended to these minutes); four of the five recommendations had been agreed and one would be accepted in part. 

 

The Committee noted that all of its recommendations to the Trading Companies Shareholder meeting in relation to the Trading Companies Business Plan had been accepted.

74.

Work Plan and Forward Plan pdf icon PDF 151 KB

 

Background Information

The Scrutiny Committee operates within a work plan which is agreed at the start of the Council year.  The work plan will be reviewed at every meeting so that it can be adjusted to reflect the wishes of the Committee and take account of any changes to the latest Forward Plan (which outlines decisions to be taken by the City Executive Board or Council).

Why is it on the agenda?

The Committee is asked to review and note its work plan for the 2017/18 council year.

 

The Committee is also asked to select Forward Plan items for pre-decision scrutiny based on the following criteria (max. 3 per meeting):

     Is the issue controversial / of significant public interest?

     Is it an area of high expenditure?

     Is it an essential service / corporate priority?

     Can Scrutiny influence and add value?

 

This is also an opportunity for chairs of standing panels and review groups to update the Committee on their work.

Who has been invited to comment?

·         Andrew Brown, Committee and Member Services Manager.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Scrutiny Officer alerted the Committee to revised report scheduling in the Forward Plan and suggested some changes to the Committee’s work plan. 

 

The Committee agreed the following amendments to the work plan:

 

6 March agenda to include:

·         ICT restructure – this was a referral from the Finance Panel in view of the significant investment proposal set out in the 2018/19 Budget

·        Equality and Diversity tracking – this item could draw on the data collected to support Cllr Azad’s involvement with the National Association of Black, Asian and Ethnic Minority Councillors (UK) and on the latest Annual Workplace Equalities report. Effective and professional analysis of the data was essential to an informed discussion and the Scrutiny Officer was tasked with inviting a suitable candidate.   The Committee requested that a senior officer (e.g. Chief Executive / Assistant Chief Executive) should be present for the discussion.

 

2018/19 Work Plan

·         The Finance Panel had identified issues around business rates for Air BnB properties as a potential topic for review in 2018/19.

·         The Local Plan 2016 – 2036 would be submitted to Council in July 2018.  This would be the last chance for the Committee to influence the process. The Chair and the Scrutiny Officer would discuss the options for a timely and effective scrutiny contribution and bring proposals to the next meeting.

75.

Reports for approval pdf icon PDF 119 KB

 

The Committee is asked to approve the following report(s) for submission to the City Executive Board on 13/02/2018:

·         Air quality annual status report 2016

·         Budget 2018/19 – may be circulated as a late paper.

Minutes:

The Scrutiny Committee had considered the Air Quality Annual Status Report 2016 at its meeting on 15 January 2018 and agreed that recommendations should be made to the City Executive Board as a result.  The Scrutiny Officer introduced the report which proposed those recommendations.  The Committee agreed that the report should be put to the City Executive Board at its meeting on 13 February. 

 

The Scrutiny Officer explained that the Finance Panel report setting out recommendations on the Budget 2018/19 was still in draft; the final version of the report would be circulated to the Committee in advance of the City Executive Board meeting.

76.

Children & Young Person Strategy 2018-2023 pdf icon PDF 105 KB

 

Background Information

The Scrutiny Committee has asked for this item to be included on the agenda for pre-decision scrutiny.

Why is it on the agenda?

The City Executive Board on 13 February 2018 will be asked to:

1.    Agree the pre consultation version of the Children & Young People’s  Strategy; and

2.    Commence the consultation process on the draft Children & Young People’s Strategy.

This is an opportunity for the Scrutiny Committee to make recommendations to the City Executive Board.

Who has been invited to comment?

·         Councillor Marie Tidball, Board Member for Young People, Schools and Public Health;

·         Ian Brooke, Head of Community Services.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair took this item first.

 

Councillor Tidball, Board Member for Young People, Schools and Public Health presented the pre-consultation draft of the Children & Young Persons Strategy (2018 – 2023).  She highlighted the following key points:

·       That the draft strategy was underpinned by three principles

  1. Preventative-led provision (early intervention)
  2. Equality, inclusion and engagement of young people
  3. Facilitating effective partnership working

·       That the Council would use the “ Ready by 21 Framework” to share and review data about young people to look at the root causes of the societal problems facing young people

·       The trial use of a zoning methodology to focus on specific localities across the city in order to support those communities who need it most and to deliver solutions which respond to specific needs   

·       That the City Council was working closely with the County Council to identify areas where the  City Council’s services could complement and add value to the County Council’s regulatory role

 

The Committee explored these points in more detail during an extensive discussion.  The Committee also reflected on the challenges facing the Council and its partners in seeking to create “cultural enrichment in primary school education” against the backdrop of a restricting curriculum. The Council was actively seeking to identify ways in which it could work with schools and partners to access the cultural benefits that the city of Oxford could offer.

 

The Committee noted and welcomed the report.

77.

Update of the Corporate Plan 2018 pdf icon PDF 120 KB

 

Background Information

The Scrutiny Committee has asked for this item to be included on the agenda for pre-decision scrutiny.

Why is it on the agenda?

The City Executive Board on 13 February 2018 will be asked to: 

1.    Approve the Annual Update report on the Corporate Plan 2016-20, as set out in Annex 1.

2.    Delegate authority to the Assistant Chief Executive to make minor textual/formatting changes to the Annual Update Report in advance of formal publication

3.    Delegate authority for the Assistant Chief Execute to add new success measures to the Annual Update Report (point 13) once agreed with Service Heads and the Chief Executive.

 

This is an opportunity for the Scrutiny Committee to make recommendations to the City Executive Board.

Who has been invited to comment?

·         Councillor Bob Price, Board Member for Corporate Strategy and Economic Development;

·         Councillor Susan Brown, Board Member for Customer and Corporate Services;

·         Caroline Green, Assistant Chief Executive;

·         Mish Tullar, Corporate Policy, Partnership and Communications Manager.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Scrutiny Committee considered the Annual Update Report on the Corporate Plan 2016-20.  The Board Member for Corporate Strategy and Economic Development, the Executive Director for Sustainable City, and the Corporate Policy, Partnership and Communications Manager presented the report and answered questions.

 

The Committee noted the two new proposed success measures for 2018-19 around measuring ‘channel shift’ (i.e. increases in the proportion of self-service customer interactions), and the change of focus from targeting overall increases in leisure centre usage to increasing usage amongst target groups while stabilising usage amongst non-target groups.  The Committee asked for further context around current leisure usage and heard that leisure centre attendances were projected to total 1.2m in the current year against a target of 1.45m.  The Committee explored the reasons for this and identified key factors as being lower growth in demand for local authority provision, increased competition from budget providers, and the availability and popularity of alternative ways of keeping fit (e.g. ‘green gyms’, pitch sports, dance, martial arts, etc.).

 

The Committee concluded that the Council should adopt a new measure to reflect this changing picture and recognise the Council’s wider role in enabling people to lead fit and healthy lives in the city.  Consideration should be given to any suitable national measures that could be adopted, such as Sport England’s new Active Lives Survey, which replaces the Active People Survey.  It was also noted that sports facilities and community centres in the city could be asked to provide data to support a local measure, if required. 

 

The Committee commented that the addition of a corporate performance measure linked to the promotion of the Oxford Living Wage would be very welcome in light of the Council’s longstanding policy commitment and the recent scrutiny review (which is due to conclude in March 2018).

 

The Board Member for Corporate Strategy and Economic Development said that this was a useful suggestion and that £5k had been allocated to the Economic Development Team for the promotion of the Oxford Living Wage.  The Committee agreed to bring forward the recommendation of the Oxford Living Wage Review Group on setting living wage targets.

 

The Committee identified the following key points as having emerged from the discussion that could be presented to the City Executive Board as recommendations:

1.       That the Council sets an additional corporate target for wider engagement in sport, exercise and leisure activities in the city.

2.       That the Council sets additional targets for the promotion of the ‘living wage’, with at least one such target monitored at the corporate level:

a.     The number of accredited living wage employers based in the city (e.g. doubling the current number of 69 within 2 years).

b.     The number of local employers paying the Oxford Living Wage.

78.

Grant Allocations to Community and Voluntary Organisations 2018/19 pdf icon PDF 131 KB

 

Background Information

The Scrutiny Committee has asked for this item to be included on the agenda for pre-decision scrutiny.

Why is it on the agenda?

The City Executive Board on 13 February 2018 will be asked to:

1.    Approve the recommendations for the commissioning programme as set out in Appendices 1 and 2.

2.    Delegate authority to the Head of Community Services, in consultation with the Executive Members for Customer and Corporate Services and Culture and Communities, to approve the recommendations for applications received to the grants open bidding programme for 2018-21 and allocate funding to art and culture organisations that apply for funding through this theme from April 2019.

3.    Delegate authority to the Executive Director for Organisational Development and Corporate Services in consultation with the Executive Members for Customer and Corporate Services and Culture and Communities to allocate the development fund in the Advice and Money Management commissioning theme for 2018-21.

 

This is an opportunity for the Scrutiny Committee to make recommendations to the City Executive Board.

Who has been invited to comment?

·         Councillor Dee Sinclair, Board Member for Culture and Communities;

·         Councillor Susan Brown, Board Member for Customer and Corporate Services;

·         Julia Tomkins, Grants and External Funding Officer.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee noted that the Board Member for Culture and Communities had sent apologies as she had a prior engagement.

 

The Board Member for Customer and Corporate Services reminded the Committee on the key points that emerged from the review of the community grants programme in 2017. She said that the underlying principles were to provide a degree of consistency and stability necessary for forward planning by those organisations in the grant programme; to maintain a close alignment with Council priorities; and to make the grant application process open to new organisations. She highlighted the new 2018 Development Fund, which allowed advice services to make partnership bids, as an example of the Council’s continued commitment to investment in a sector which had experienced significant cuts in funding from other organisations.

 

The Head of Community Services explained the reasoning behind the proposed officer delegation to approve applications to the Annual Open Bidding programme.  He said that the main objective was to minimise the delay in issuing grants to organisations.

 

The Grants & External Funding Officer reported back on the work done to address the scrutiny recommendations on the Review of Community Grants Programme decision in November 2017, which included a focus on promoting  BAME engagement with the grants programme. She said that four workshops had been held to explain the grants process and these had been promoted within the BAME community.  In total 8 out of the 17 workshop attendees and 10 out of the 22 small grants programme applications were from the BAME community.

 

The Committee noted that the Council required all organisations in the grants programme to be fully inclusive although it was recognised that some organisations were dedicated to a particular BAME issue.

 

The Committee noted the report and acknowledged the valuable contribution made by volunteers.

79.

Review of use of Community Protection Notices (CPN Review) pdf icon PDF 150 KB

 

Background Information

The Scrutiny Committee has asked for this item to be included on the agenda for pre-decision scrutiny.

Why is it on the agenda?

The City Executive Board on 13 February 2018 will be asked to:

1.    Endorse the report, including the findings of the CPN Review and Cross-Party Panel; and

2.    Authorise the Head of Community Services in consultation with the Board Member for Community Safety to update the Antisocial Behaviour Policy and Antisocial Behaviour Procedures in line with the recommendations made.

This is an opportunity for the Scrutiny Committee to make recommendations to the City Executive Board.

Who has been invited to comment?

·         Councillor Tom Hayes, Board Member for Community Safety;

·         Tim Sadler, Executive Director for Sustainable City.

·         Richard Adams, Community Safety & Resilience Manager.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Wade addressed the Committee and asked for the report to be re-drafted before being presented to the City Executive Board.  She said that the findings and recommendations of the cross-party panel meeting described in the report did not reflect the views expressed by herself and Councillors Gant and Thomas at the meeting they attended on 29 January 2018.

 

Councillors Gant and Thomas re-iterated the points made by Councillor Wade.

 

In conclusion Councillor Wade asked the Committee and the Board Member for Community Safety to consider the following points which she, Councillor Gant and Councillor Thomas believed should be in place before CPN proceedings were started:

a.     There should be documented evidence of attempts to engage the individual and an assessment of his/her vulnerability to legal process.

b.     There should be a formal Protocol agreed by Legal setting out the process to be followed in each case under the Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014.

c.     There should always be a written legal advice on file.

d.     The process should be authorised in each case by the Head of Service and the Head of Law and Governance – and there should be no time limit on this requirement.

 

In response the Board Member for Community Safety said that he could agree point a) as it reflected current practice; that point b) was agreeable in relation to complex cases; but  that he had reservations about accepting points c) and d) due to practical and operational considerations. 

 

The Board Member for Community Safety and the Executive Director for Sustainable City said that the content of the report was based on the conclusions of an earlier cross-party meeting attended by members from the controlling political group and the independent member.  The minutes of that meeting could be made available.  They acknowledged that the report did not take account of the views expressed by Councillors Wade, Gant and Thomas at the meeting held on 29 January 2018.

 

The Board Member for Community Safety, the Executive Director for Sustainable City and the Community Safety & Resilience Manager then presented the report and answered questions from members of the Committee.

 

The Community Safety & Resilience Manager explained that legal advice was sought for all complex cases but that the volume of enforcement activity meant that it would not be practical or necessary to provide written legal advice for all cases.

 

In discussion the Committee considered the nature of the needs and problems in the city that CPNs could be used to address and the extent of checks and balances in the process for issuing CPNs. 

 

The Committee also noted that a legal opinion had been obtained by Councillor Thomas which, while it could not have been based on the full facts of any specific case the Council had dealt with, would be considered as part of the subsequent review of the Anti-social Behaviour Policy and the Anti-social Behaviours Procedures.

 

Members of the Committee suggested that any future informal meetings involving members from beyond any one political group  ...  view the full minutes text for item 79.

80.

Dates of future meetings

Meetings are scheduled as followed:

 

Scrutiny Committee

 

 

6 March 2018

 

5 April 2018

17 May 2018

 

 

All meetings start at 6.00 pm.

 

Standing Panels

Housing Standing Panel – 8 March 2018, 6pm start

Finance Standing Panel – 14 March 2018, 6pm start

Companies Panel – 14 March 2018, 5pm start

 

 

Minutes:

The Committee noted the dates of the meetings to be held in March 2018.