Agenda item
Additional funding for feasibility studies for investment property development opportunities
- Meeting of Finance Panel (Panel of the Scrutiny Committee), Monday 4 September 2017 6.00 pm (Item 62.)
- View the background to item 62.
Background Information |
The report provides an update on the progress of a number of identified opportunities to maintain or improve the income stream from the Council’s property investment portfolio and seeks approval for an increased budget requirement. The Scrutiny Committee asked for this item to be included on the agenda for pre-decision scrutiny. |
Why is it on the agenda? |
The City Executive Board on 19 September will be asked to: 1. Note the progress on the various schemes that had been identified and had budget approval to the value of £10,300,000. 2. Recommend to Council an increase of £4,635,000 to the allocated budget to deliver specific development opportunities. 3. Authorise entering into exclusive negotiations to seek financially viable agreements to lease with two identified commercial tenants, subject to Council budgetary approval. 4. Enter into agreements for lease at rental levels above the threshold of £125,000 per annum in line with the constitution. 5. Delegate to the Interim Assistant Chief Executive – Regeneration and Economy, in consultation with the Head of Financial Services, the authority to alter the terms of the agreements to lease on the basis that they continue to represent best value during negotiations. |
Who has been invited to comment? |
· Fiona Piercy, Assistant Chief Executive – Regeneration & Economy; · Nick Twigg, Major Projects and Development Manager. |
Minutes:
The Major Projects and Development Manager introduced the report. He said that the existing projects had grown significantly in size and cost but that densities and projected rental income had also increased. It was recommended that some new projects would be added where vacant premises required capital expenditure.
The Panel questioned the implications of the Council not being able to let properties on assured shorthold tenancies (paragraph 30) and whether the margin was beneficial to the Council or not. The Head of Financial Services Advised that he would seek clarity from Legal Services on this point.
A minority of the Panel thought that it would make more sense for the site in Cave Street to be used for housing and for the new housing planned on the East Oxford Community Centre site to be substituted for business units. This proposal would maximise housing and maintain the integrity of the East Oxford Community Centre site.
Supporting documents:
- CEB Ver 12 (Legal Finance ACE), item 62. PDF 130 KB View as DOCX (62./1) 178 KB
- Appendix 1 - Plan of 1-5 George Street, item 62. PDF 243 KB
- Appendix 2 - Plan of Standingford House, item 62. PDF 182 KB
- Appendix 3a - External View 1, item 62. PDF 3 MB
- Appendix 3b - External View 2, item 62. PDF 3 MB
- Appendix 3c - Internal View, item 62. PDF 382 KB
- Appendix 4a - 9-10 Ship Street, item 62. PDF 241 KB
- Appendix 4b - 11 New Road, item 62. PDF 236 KB
- Appendix 6 - Capital Expenditure, item 62. PDF 55 KB