Private Sector Housing Policy
- Meeting of Housing Panel (Panel of the Scrutiny Committee), Monday 1 February 2016 5.00 pm (Item 27.)
- View the background to item 27.
The City Executive Board on 11 February 2016 will be asked to approve the draft Private Sector Housing Policy 2016 – 2019 for public consultation.
Why is it on the agenda?
The Panel has asked for this item to be included on the agenda for pre-decision scrutiny. This is an opportunity for the Panel to make recommendations to the City Executive Board.
The Panel is recommended to:
i) Note the content of the report;
ii) Make any recommendations it sees fit;
iii) Consider when it may wish to receive any future update on the Private Sector Housing Policy (e.g. post-consultation).
Who has been invited to comment?
Councillor Bob Price, Leader and Board Member for Regulation and Licensing of Private Rented Sector
Ian Wright, Environmental Health Service Manager
Michael Browning, Private Sector Safety Team Leader
The Environmental Health Service Manager introduced the report. The Panel heard that Oxford had a relatively high proportion of private rented accommodation and relatively low levels of owner-occupation. In an otherwise deregulatory era, Government was strengthening the regulation of this sector. The new private sector housing policy sat under the Council’s Housing Strategy.
The Panel asked a wide range of questions, including about; how the Council can identify other properties owned by landlords, whether more could be done to return empty properties to use, what was being done to address the issue of beds in sheds and how any priority area for the selected licensing of non-HMO private rented sector accommodation would be evaluated. The Panel heard that the Council would need permission to introduce a selective licensing scheme covering more than 20% of the geographical area of the city. Any assessment of priority areas for selective licensing would be based on how best to maximise the stock that would be covered by the scheme, as well as the volumes of service requests and reports of anti-social behaviour in different parts of the city. Ideally the sector would pay for its own regulation, as happens with HMO licensing.
The Panel questioned how tenants in the private rented sector would be encouraged to engage in the consultation and heard that this was a challenge with the exception of students as private rented sector tenants were disparate and not formally organised in groups.
The Panel noted that the Council’s primary focus to date had been on regulating the houses in multiple occupation (HMO) market. The Panel questioned the links and information sharing between the HMO enforcement and planning enforcement functions and found that the while some checks were in place, the Council could not legally refuse a HMO license application on the basis that planning permission had not been sought or granted. Refusals could only be based on the condition of the property and a fit and proper person test.
The Panel questioned what could be done to address the issue of rubbish or bulky items being left outside HMOs, for example when students vacate these properties at the end of term. The Panel heard that there were various enforcement options the Council could use, including serving a notice on the landlord to remove items within 7 days and the option of works in default, where the Council could remove the items and bill the landlord. In the event that the landlord then refused to pay, a charge could be held against the property until such a time as it was sold.
The Panel questioned how residents could report an unlicensed HMOs or an HMO in poor repair and heard that this facility was available online.
The Panel agreed to scrutinise a refresh of the Council’s Empty Property Strategy and will have the opportunity to scrutinise the Private Sector Housing Strategy again following the public consultation.
The Panel supported the general approach taken and agreed to make five recommendations to the City Executive Board:
1. That direct invitations to comment should be sent to Parish Councils and any lease-holders forums, in addition to the stakeholders listed in the report.
2. That the consultation should be promoted through channels such as the Your Oxford newsletter and that further consideration should be given to how the Council can best engage with private rented sector tenants, perhaps through an ‘appreciative enquiry’.
3. That the Council should make fuller use of the powers available to it to enforce the removal of waste and bulky items left outside HMO properties.
4. That Council Officers are asked to provide an update on the feasibility of increasing the number of free bulky items collections available to tenants living in HMOs. This should include the feasibility of offering free bulky items collections on a ‘per household’ rather than ‘per property’ basis.
5. That the facility to report suspected unlicensed HMOs should be promoted more widely, including through Tenants in Touch.
- Private Sector Housing Policy CEB (v1), item 27. PDF 122 KB View as DOCX (27./1) 294 KB
- Appendix 1 - Private Sector Housing Policy (DEC15) (v1), item 27. PDF 2 MB View as DOCX (27./2) 2 MB
- Appendix 2 Risk Register Private Sector Housing Policy, item 27. PDF 12 KB
- Appendix 3 - Initial Equalities Impact Assessment Private Sector Housing Policy, item 27. PDF 67 KB View as DOCX (27./4) 52 KB