General

For 25/01788/FUL, Councillor Fouweather declared that he had been involved in the call-in regarding the application and that he would watch from the public gallery for this item.

For 25/02702/FUL, Councillor Railton declared that she was pre-determined, as she had been part of the call-in for the application and that she would leave the meeting for this item.

For 25/02702/FUL, Councillor Ottino declared that he was pre-determined, as he had been part of the call-in for the application and that he would leave the meeting for this item.

For 25/02702/FUL, Councillor Muddiman declared that she was pre-determined as she was speaking in favour of the application and would watch from the public gallery for this item.

For 25/02092/FUL, Councillor Kerr stated that the site was in her ward and that she had visited it. She stated that she had not discussed planning matters in detail and was not pre-determined.

For 25/01788/FUL, Councillor Hollingsworth declared that although he had received emails from individuals objecting to the application, he had not pre-judged the matter or expressed any opinion and was not pre-determined.

For 25/01788/FUL, Councillor Kerr stated that the applicant was the University and that her husband was a senior member of the institution. She stated that she had been unaware that the applicant was the University and approached the meeting with an open mind and had not discussed the matter at all.