Issue - meetings
Bertie Place Land Appropriation
Meeting: 16/10/2024 - Cabinet (Item 48)
48 Bertie Place Land Appropriation PDF 426 KB
The Executive Director (Development) submits a report to Cabinet which seeks approval to appropriate land (change the statutory basis on which it is held by the Council from one function to another) currently held for public open space purposes at Bertie Place Recreation Ground (the “Land”). This paper relates to the appropriation of part of Site A to a planning purpose for the objective of building affordable housing.
Cabinet is recommended to:
1. Note that following the statutory public notification process of the Council’s intention to appropriate the Land to planning purposes, three written representations (including one signed by 97 people) were received in response to the public notice; and
2. Approve the appropriation of part of the land in the Council’s ownership at Bertie Place Recreation Ground Site A (see Image 1 for plan) (“the Land”), to planning purposes, so as to facilitate its future development for new housing (per planning application number 23/00988/FUL).
Additional documents:
- Appendix 1A Consultation responses Redacted 240513 (1) (1), item 48 PDF 5 MB
- Appendix 1B revised summary and response to objections amended, item 48 PDF 178 KB View as DOCX (48/3) 34 KB
- Appendix 1C Bertie Place Aug Cabinet objection (1), item 48 PDF 463 KB
- Appendix 1D Public addresses and questions that do not relate to matters for decision at this Council meeting (1), item 48 PDF 285 KB
- Appendix 2 Bertie Place Full Equalities Impact Assessment v0.2 confidential (1), item 48 PDF 383 KB
Minutes:
The Executive Director (Development) submitted a report to Cabinet which sought approval to appropriate land (change the statutory basis on which it is held by the Council from one function to another) currently held for public open space purposes at Bertie Place Recreation Ground (the “Land”). This paper relates to the appropriation of part of Site A to a planning purpose for the objective of building affordable housing.
Councillor Smith presented the report on this matter. She stated that this site has been earmarked for social housing for quite some time. Due to the housing crisis and cost of housing in Oxford, building homes such as those planned for Bertie Place is a dire need for the city. Councillor Smith stated that the housing costs in Oxford are a central reason why a quarter of the city’s children live below the poverty line. The social housing planned for Bertie Place will help to address Oxford’s housing crisis. Councillor Smith added that the proposal balances the need to engage with the local community while also addressing Oxford’s need for more social housing.
Dave Scholes, Affordable Housing Supply Corporate Lead, discussed the consultation that had been undertaken by the Council with the local community at Bertie Place. He stated that this consultation had helped to guide the choices they had made in this proposal, confirming that the land identified was no longer required by the Council for its current purpose, and noting the Equalities Impact Assessment undertaken at Appendix 2 to the report.
Councillor Hollingsworth asked about the area to be appropriated. He asked if the open space to be appropriated was to be replaced with space on site A and the open space on site B. He asked for clarity regarding exactly what is being appropriated. He also asked, for the benefit of the meeting, if the Wednesbury Rules of Unreasonableness could be explained.
The Affordable Housing Supply Corporate Lead responded that the land that they are proposing to appropriate can be found in the red line in paragraph five of the report. That is the land being proposed for housing development. Excluded from that is the new location for the playground, as that will be left as a recreation site.
Emma Jackman, Head of Law and Governance, explained that the Wednesbury Rules of Unreasonableness are a tool that is used in assessing applications for judicial review. The Wednesbury Rules of Unreasonableness can be implemented to demonstrate if a decision is so unreasonable that no rational person could have reached that decision. This is a high test for unreasonableness, above what is commonly used.
Councillor Hollingsworth added that the Wednesbury Rules of Unreasonableness test would show that no rational person could reasonably reach a decision. He stated that in terms of land appropriation, they have two new play areas being opened in new areas and that this decision does not meet the test of being so unreasonable that a rational person would not reach that decision. Councillor Hollingsworth argued that what ... view the full minutes text for item 48