Issue - meetings

Issue - meetings

20/02417/FUL: Development of 76 & 78 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6JT

Meeting: 13/07/2021 - Planning - Oxford City Planning Committee (Item 17)

17 20/02417/FUL: Development of 76 & 78 Banbury Road, Oxford pdf icon PDF 584 KB

Proposal:                        Conversion of No.78 Banbury Road to office and teaching (Use Class E/ F1) in association with No.76 Banbury Road headquarters building. Demolition of existing swimming pool and studio and erection of a new office building and hall to the rear of Nos.76 and 78 Banbury Road. Demolition of existing to garage No.78 and erection of a 1 x 3-bed dwelling (Use Class C3). Demolition of the existing extensions between Nos.76 and 78 Banbury Road and erection of new link extension to form new entrance and reception. Alterations to existing car park to create an enclosed courtyard and alterations to landscaping.           

Reason at Committee:     Called in by Called in by Councillors Wade, Goddard, Landell Mills, R Smith and ex-councillors Garden and Harris.

Recommendation:

The Oxford City Planning Committee is recommended to:

1.     approve the application for the reasons given in the report and subject to the required planning conditions set out in section 12 of the report and grant planning permission;

2.     agree to delegate authority to the Head of Planning Services to:

·       finalise the recommended conditions as set out in the report including such refinements, amendments, additions and/or deletions as the Head of Planning Services considers reasonably necessary; and

·       issue the planning permission.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered an application (20/02417/FUL) for planning permission for demolitions, conversion and re-development at Nos.76 and 78 Banbury Road to provide offices, meeting rooms, multi-purpose hall and general facilities in conjunction with No.76 Banbury Road that is currently occupied by the Ravi Zacharias International Ministries Trust (RZIM) as their office headquarters. Also provision of a new replacement 3 bed residential dwelling in lieu of the converted No.78 Banbury Road.

 

The application was before the Committee as it had been called in by Councillors Wade, Goddard, Landell Mills, R Smith and ex-councillors Garden and Harris.

 

The Planning Officer presented the report. She advised the Committee that she proposed to revise the wording of Condition 5 to address concerns raised about parking controls (proposed changes shown in italics):

Condition 5: The development shall not be brought into use until the car parking area has been be constructed and laid out in accordance with the revised site plan drawing no.6.3.0a showing car parking for the development.  Thereafter the areas shall be retained solely for the purpose of the parking of vehicles in relation to the occupiers of Nos.76 and 78 Banbury Road only.  and There shall be no parking spaces for the residential dwelling at any time and for the avoidance of doubt this shall include any occupier associated with and/or employed by and/or under a leasehold or any other form of rental agreement with the main occupier of No.76 and 78 Banbury Road or as freeholder of the new dwelling hereby approved.

 

Mr Philip Green, representing the Linton Road Neighbourhood Association spoke against the application. 

Mr Ian Smith and Mr Arthur Smith, representing the applicant, spoke in favour of the application.

 

In discussion the Committee explored the implications of the development on the local area in terms of traffic levels, parking and road safety, noting the concerns raised by local residents and by the public speaker but acknowledging that these matters would be addressed by conditions and that the Highways Authority, as the statutory consultee, had raised no objections to the proposed development.

 

The Committee also considered the detailed design features of some elements of the proposed development; the impact of the development on the conservation area; and sought clarity on the proposals to use the “multifunctional hall” for community events and weddings.

 

In reaching its decision, the Committee considered all the information put before it.

 

After debate and on being proposed, seconded and put to the vote, the Committee agreed with the officer’s recommendation to approve the application subject to the amendment to the wording of Condition 5 as detailed above and the inclusion of a further condition to secure details of measures to close the unused existing accesses on to the Banbury Road to ensure the proposed one way system through the site between Banbury Road and Bardwell Road. Such mitigation measures would also reduce confusion of which access to use and should ensure that there was ready access to the site to avoid the Banbury Road becoming a  ...  view the full minutes text for item 17