Issue - meetings
18/02644/FUL: Site Of Millway Close, Oxford, OX2 8BJ
Meeting: 11/02/2020 - West Area Planning Committee (Item 81)
81 18/02644/FUL: Site Of Millway Close, Oxford, OX2 8BJ PDF 401 KB
Site address: Site Of Millway Close, Oxford, OX2 8BJ
Proposal: Erection of 4 x 1 bed flats (Use Class C3) to first and second floor infills between existing block gable ends. Provision of bike storage. Retaining all car parking spaces, garages and refuse stores.
Reason at Committee |
The application has been called into committee at the request of Councillors Goddard, Gotch, Harris, Garden and Smith due to concerns relating to the impact on existing residents and parking issues. |
Recommendation:
The West Area Planning Committee is recommended to:
1. Approve the application for the reasons given in the report and subject to the required planning conditions set out in section 11 of the report and grant planning permission.
2. agree to delegate authority to the Head of Planning Services to:
· finalise the recommended conditions as set out in the report including such refinements, amendments, additions and/or deletions as the Head of Planning Services considers reasonably necessary.
Additional documents:
- 18-02644-FUL Appendix 1 Millway Close, item 81 PDF 199 KB
- 18-02644-FUL Millway Close presentation, item 81 PDF 2 MB
Minutes:
The Committee considered an application (18/02644/FUL) for planning permission for the erection of 4 x 1 bed flats (Use Class C3) to first and second floor infills between existing block gable ends; the provision of bike storage; and retaining all car parking spaces, garages and refuse stores.
The application had been called into committee at the request of Councillors Goddard, Gotch, Harris, Garden and Roz Smith due to concerns relating to the impact on existing residents and parking issues.
The application was previously considered by the West Area Planning Committee in November 2019, where a resolution to defer determination of the application was made to enable the correct notices to be served on the leaseholders at Millway Close and the correct certificate submitted. A request was also made to seek the comments of Thames Valley Police and the Fire Service, with a further suggestion that the proposed location of the cycle parking be amended.
The Planning Officer presented the report and gave the following verbal updates:
· Evidence had been provided to demonstrate that all correct the notices had now been served on the leaseholders of the flats.
· Amended plans had been submitted showing amendments to the position of the proposed cycle parking.
· The Police and Fire Service had been consulted and their comments were set out in full in Section 8 of the report. Overall no objections are raised.
· Comments had been received on behalf of Millway Close Leaseholders in response to the amended cycle parking proposals. In summary the comments state the view that the revised number of cycle parking spaces is considered to be sufficient, however the unanimously preferred option would be to site the cycle parking in the location of the former bin store rather than the intended locations.
· 3 additional public comments had been received objecting on the following grounds:
- The location of the cycle parking spaces
- No affordable housing provision
- The loss of amenity areas owing to the location of the cycle parking
- Concern about the dimensions of the access spaces between the flats
- Security of the bike and bin stores
- The design of the windows not matching the existing style
- Natural lights to the rear facing internal spaces of the flats
The Planning Officer recommended an amendment to the wording of Condition 4, (on cycle parking) to require the provision of a cycle parking plan prior to occupation without the reference to 116 spaces.
Natasha Robinson (Millway Close Leaseholders) spoke against the application and read a statement from Nicholas Loft-Simpson (local resident).
James Gillies, the agent representing the applicant, spoke in favour of the application.
The Committee noted that the objections and concerns about security and safety would be addressed through Condition 17 which would require the applicant to obtain Secured by Design accreditation for the development. The Committee agreed to include a further condition for the provision of lighting in the access passages.
The Committee also sought assurances in relation to specific concerns raised by ... view the full minutes text for item 81
Meeting: 12/11/2019 - West Area Planning Committee (Item 53)
53 18/02644/FUL: Site Of Millway Close, Oxford, OX2 8BJ PDF 387 KB
Site address: Site Of Millway Close, Oxford, OX2 8BJ
Proposal: Erection of 4 x 1 bed flats (Use Class C3) to first and second floor infills between existing block gable ends. Provision of bike storage. Retaining all car parking spaces, garages and refuse stores.
Reason at Committee: The application has been called into committee at the request of Councillors Goddard, Gotch, Harris, Garden and Smith due to concerns relating to the impact on existing residents and parking issues.
Recommendation:
The West Area Planning Committee is recommended to:
1. Approve the application for the reasons given in the report and subject to the required planning conditions set out in section 11 of this report and grant planning permission.
2. agree to delegate authority to the Head of Planning Services to:
· finalise the recommended conditions as set out in this report including such refinements, amendments, additions and/or deletions as the Head of Planning Services considers reasonably necessary
Additional documents:
- 18-02644-FUL Appendix 1 Millway Close, item 53 PDF 199 KB
- Presentation 18-02644-FUL Millway Close, item 53 PDF 4 MB
Minutes:
The Committee considered an application (18/02644/FUL) for planning permission for the erection of 4 x 1 bed flats (Use Class C3) to first and second floor infills between existing block gable ends; provision of bike storage and retention of all car parking spaces, garages and refuse stores.
The application had been called into the Committee at the request of Councillors Goddard, Gotch, Harris, Garden and Smith due to concerns relating to the impact on existing residents and parking issues.
The Planning Officer presented the report and made the following observations in relation to transport and parking:
· The proposed development was not “car free” as defined in the Local Plan but there was no allocated parking associated with the development
· The parking survey undertaken by the applicant indicated that there was adequate capacity for any additional parking demands resulting from the proposed development.
Natasha Robinson, representing the Millway Close Leaseholders Association, spoke against the application.
James Gillies, representing the applicant, spoke in favour of the application.
The Committee asked questions of the officers and speakers and raised a number of concerns about the proposal. These included the lack of details relating to the proposed location and design of the cycle parking which should be covered and not prominent in the amenity space; the potential for an increase in anti-social behaviour by the enclosure of the existing “bin and cycle” areas.
The Committee was especially concerned by the assertionof the local leasehold residents that they had not been consulted by the applicant on the proposed development.
The Planning Lawyer confirmed thatthe applicant was required to serve notice of the application on anyone with a leasehold interest that exceeds 7 years. The certificate of ownership submitted with the application stated that the applicant was the sole owner of the site. Mr Gillies, speaking on behalf of the applicant, indicated that this was because his client owned the freehold of the refuse stores where the flats were to be located. The Planning Lawyer confirmed that the red line plan submitted with the application covered the whole site rather than just the refuse stores and therefore the correct certificate of ownership had not been issued. Accordingly she recommended that the Committee should defer consideration of the application to allow for notice to be served on the leaseholders and for the correct certificate to be submitted.
A motion to defer the decision to allow this to be undertaken was proposed which also requested further details and revised locations for the cycle stores and confirmation from Thames Valley Police with respect to the concerns raised about the access arrangement alongside the refuse stores.
On being seconded and put to the vote the Committee agreed to defer the application for the reason given above.
The West Area Planning Committee resolved to defer the decision on this application to allow the required notices to be served, the correct certificate to be submitted and to enable the Head of Planning Services to bring the application to a future ... view the full minutes text for item 53