Issue - meetings

Issue - meetings

Risk Management report: Quarterly 2017/18

Meeting: 12/03/2018 - Audit and Governance Committee (Item 47)

47 Risk Management Quarterly Reporting as at 31 December 2017. pdf icon PDF 144 KB

Report of: The Head of Financial Services

 

Purpose of report:  To update the Committee on both corporate and service risks as at 31 December 2017

 

Recommendation: to discuss and note the report.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered the report of the Head of Financial Services giving an update on both corporate and service risks as at 31 December 2017.

 

The Committee noted that two new service area risks had been added:

·       Law & Governance – relating to the new General Data Protection Regulations which comes into effect on 25 May 2018.

·       Community Services – relating to legal action against the Council in regards to sex establishment licence fees.

 

The Committee noted the report.


Meeting: 11/01/2018 - Audit and Governance Committee (Item 38)

38 Risk Management Quarterly Reporting as at 30 November 2017. pdf icon PDF 145 KB

Report of: Head of Financial Services

 

Purpose of report: to update the Committee on both corporate and service risks as at 30 November 2017.

 

Recommendation: That the Committee notes the content of the report

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered the report of the Head of Financial Services giving an update on both corporate and service risks as at 30 November 2017.

 

The Committee noted the report.


Meeting: 26/09/2017 - Audit and Governance Committee (Item 25)

25 Risk Management report: Quarter 1 2017/18 pdf icon PDF 148 KB

Report of: Head of Financial Services

 

Purpose of report: to update the Committee on both corporate and service risks.

 

Recommendation: to consider and note the report.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered the report of the Head of Financial Services setting out both corporate and service risks.

The Committee noted that aged debt related primarily to provision of commercial services plus some household debt and that the risk rating for community cohesion had changed because the impact of an incident was judged to have increased, but there was no evidence this was more likely to occur.

 

The Committee agreed to note the report.