Decision details
Aristotle Lane Footbridge, Aristotle Lane: 14/01348/FUL
Decision status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Decisions:
The Head of City Development submitted a report (previously circulated now appended) which detailed an application for planning permission fordemolition of the existing footbridge and erection of a replacement footbridge with ramped approaches and new stepped access. Provision of 12 car parking spaces and change of use of part of land adjacent to railway lines for educational purposes as part of SS Phillip and James School.
Tim King spoke against the application; he raised a number of landscaping issues.
John Griffin (SS Philip & James School), Colin Field and Paul Brakefield (Network Rail) spoke in favour of the application.
The Committee discussed the issue of landscaping and retaining the trees to mask the visibility of the bridge, the noise from the trains and to maintain the rural landscape of the area. Officers advised these concerns could be managed through the currently proposed conditions:
Condition 3 – to include safeguarding the wiggly path leading to the West ramp
Condition 6 – to include construction access to the meadow
Condition 11 – to include native trees replanting and tree retention where possible
Condition 15 – work done by qualified arboriculturalist
The Committee resolved to GRANT planning permission subject to the following conditions and informative:
Conditions
1 Development begun within time limit
2 Develop in accordance with approved plans
3 Boundary and abutment details, including spur ramp, handrails, boundary walls and bridge parapet details
4 Flood plain storage
5 Contamination and remediation
6 Demolition and Construction Travel Plan
7 Sustainable drainage
8 Tree protection
9 Landscape plan required
10 Landscape carry out after completion
11 Landscape management plan
12 Hard surface design.
13 Underground services
14 Tree protection plan
15 Arboricultural method statement
16 Samples of materials
17 Sample panels
18. Biodiversity
19 Archaeology
20. Materials- perforated panelling on railway bridge.
Informative
Seek to replace any trees removed due to development as close as possible to the site.
Report author: Nick Worlledge
Publication date: 17/11/2015
Date of decision: 29/04/2015
Decided at meeting: 29/04/2015 - Planning Review Committee
Accompanying Documents: