Issue - meetings
Declarations of interest - EAPC 2017/18
Meeting: 12/09/2018 - East Area Planning Committee (Item 1)
Declarations of interest
Minutes:
Minutes are published under meeting of Wednesday 5 September 2018
Meeting: 05/09/2018 - East Area Planning Committee (Item 37)
Declarations of interest
Minutes:
Minute 38: 18/01173/FUL Swan School
Councillor Chapman declared he was a governor of Marston Primary School, part of the River Learning Trust, but that he approached the application with an unbiased open mind and would listen to the arguments and weigh the evidence before making a decision.
Councillor Clarkson declared that she has been involved in discussions on the location and design in her capacity as ward councillor for the area, but that she approached the application with an unbiased open mind and would listen to the arguments and weigh the evidence before making a decision.
Councillor Lygo declared that in his capacity as a county councillor he had attended meetings about this school, but that he approached the application with an unbiased open mind and would listen to the arguments and weigh the evidence before making a decision.
Councillor Hollingsworth declared he had a child attending the nearby Cherwell School, but that he approached the application with an unbiased open mind and would listen to the arguments and weigh the evidence before making a decision.
Councillor Roz Smith declared that part of her ward was in the catchment area for the proposed school and she had recently attended a public meeting about the school, but that she approached the application with an unbiased open mind and would listen to the arguments and weigh the evidence before making a decision.
Minute 40: 17/03050/FUL Land at Littlemore
Councillor Henwood declared that he was a member of Littlemore Parish Council but had not taken part in discussion on this application and had no predetermined view.
Minute 42: 18/01555/FUL 5 Colwell Drive
Councillor Tanner declared he had called the application in as it merited the decision being made in public but had no predetermined view.
Councillor Clarkson declared she had called the application in as it merited the decision being made in public but had no predetermined view.
All councillors took part in the debate and voting on these applications.